Blog

Photo by Linda HeronPhoto Credit

Category Archives: IRRP

IESO: Regional Electricity Planning in the Northwest Region – June 11, 2026

The IRRP is the planning vehicle that is meant to consider a broad range of options, including non-wires alternatives. ORA asks the IESO to hold to that purpose in the Northwest. Several large transmission builds are already underway or contemplated for the region: the $1.2 billion dollar Waasigan line, in service between 2026 and 2027,2 the Red Lake line north of Dryden, a 230 kV double-circuit build that nearly quadruples the area’s capacity, roughly 400 MW, and is expected in the early 2030s, a planned 230 kV line toward the Greenstone area, and the recently completed East-West Tie at about $777 million. The IESO has not published a cost estimate for the Red Lake line, though it almost certainly holds one; CBC reports it at $830 million. For scale, the province’s new Barrie-to-Sudbury bulk line is estimated at $1.4 to $1.6 billion. These are multi-billion-dollar commitments. A wind, solar, and battery storage package sized to a remote community’s need costs a fraction of a long transmission build and can be deployed far sooner, so communities are not left waiting years for power that a local resource could deliver.

Continue reading


IESO: Regional Electricity Planning in East Lake Superior – June 4, 2026

This regional plan shows the alternative. Local needs can be met without new bulk transmission, and the IESO’s own rationale for local supply at Sault Ste. Marie, that it reduces reliance on the transmission interface, applies equally to local wind, solar, and battery storage. Resources sited near the load need only local connections, not province-spanning corridors, and can be built faster than central nuclear or major transmission lines. Some transmission will always be needed, but it is a small fraction of what is being proposed, and it is a cumulative ratepayer commitment that the public is never shown in total. Remote communities, in particular, are where local wind, solar, and battery storage should be considered first, rather than waiting for long transmission builds.

Regional transmission and generation decisions are long-lived and effectively irreversible once made. The IESO has shown in this very plan, at Chapleau and Algoma, that real needs can be met with low-cost, right-sized solutions. The Sault Ste. Marie recommendation should be held to the same standard: prove the cost honestly, keep the competition open, and do not lock ratepayers into a fossil-gas plant that the IESO’s own analysis shows is unnecessary.

Continue reading